Utah’s Alternative Business Structures (ABS) framework, implemented through the state’s Regulatory Sandbox, introduces a limited reform to address specific gaps in the delivery of legal services within the Utah market. Utah’s ABS model is narrowly tailored to meet local needs without fundament...
Deciding Difficult Questions of Professional Ethics: A Model of Nuanced Decision-Making
How should a lawyer approach decision-making when the Rules of Professional Conduct provide discretion or in situations involving grey areas?My paper Deciding Difficult Questions of Professional Ethics: A Model of Nuanced Decision-Making discusses the benefits for lawyers to use a nuanced approach...
South Carolina abolishes the “butt-in-the-seat rule,” the development is welcome but some questions remain
Under the “butt-in-the-seat” rule, lawyers physically present in a jurisdiction must be authorized to practice in that jurisdiction even if they practice the law of another jurisdiction serving clients of the jurisdiction of admission. Naturally that rule is a remnant of a past in which the prac...
Malpractice Action against Criminal Defense Counsel – the “actual innocence rule” and its exceptions
Criminal defense counsel, like any other attorneys, are subject to civil liability for legal malpractice. See generally Ronald E. Mallen, Legal Malpractice (2022 ed.). While legal malpractice cases may be difficult to win because of the requirements of proof of breach of duty, proximate causation,...
Improper Threats
Putting aside the strategic wisdom and efficacy of a threat, when is a threat unethical? The Indiana Supreme Court’s recent decision in In re Stout, (No. 20S-DI-719 (Ind. Feb. 3, 2022) provides a good starting point for answering the question. Stout represented the respondent to a petition for a...
Arbitration of legal malpractice claim upheld by Florida Appellate Court
In Ramkelawan v. Morgan & Morgan, P.A., (3D21-1143 October 20,2021) the Third District Court of Appeal in Florida upheld a malpractice arbitration clause in the defendant’s retainer agreement. Under Florida Rule of Professional Conduct 4-1.5(i) an attorney may not make an agreement for mand...
Dealing with Language and Disability Barriers to Communication with Clients
Communication with clients is a fundamental aspect of law practice. Not only is reasonable communication an ethical requirement, under ABA Model Rule 1.4, but it is also a practical necessity as part of the lawyer’s duty of competency. A lawyer cannot adequately advise a client or make tacti...
Legal Malpractice case fails for lack of duty when the law is unclear
Legal malpractice is a catchall term for a multiple causes of action, the most basic of which is professional negligence. Like any negligence case, a claim for professional negligence requires the plaintiff to show that the defendant breached a duty to the plaintiff. The Eleventh Circuit’s rec...
ABA Opinion Allows Passive Investment by Lawyers in Alternative Business Structure Firms
In Formal Opinion 499 issued September 8, the ABA Ethics Committee dealt with the ethical propriety of a lawyer’s passive investment in an alternative business structure (“ABS”), an entity that allows for nonlawyer ownership. While ABSs are allowed in both the UK and Australia, they have onl...
Long-Lasting Covid Changes – Virtual Practice is Here to Stay
This article has been published in the PLI Chronicle: Insights and Perspectives for the Legal Community, https://plus.pli.edu. While the “new normal” may be a cliché, it does highlight the fact that Covid-19 has dramatically affected the legal profession and that many of these effects are lik...
Client Threats and the Attorney-Client Privilege
You represent an unstable client. Choose your area of practice – It happens regardless of field. During the course of a meeting, the client makes threatening statements, which you take seriously: Maybe it’s a client who has lost a civil case and is furious with the judge, who the client thin...
Red Flags for Departing Lawyers and their Former Firms
Lateral hiring, like many other business activities, declined in 2020, but the Spring of 2021 has shown a strong rebound. In light of this development, law firms and lawyers who are considering a move would be interested in two recent cases. Jacobson Holman, PLLC v. Gentner , 244 A.3d 690 (D.C. C...
Inadvertent Production and Waiver of Privilege/Work Product Protection
In document-intensive litigation the risk of inadvertent production of material subject to attorney-client privilege or work product protection is a major concern for both plaintiffs and defense counsel. A complex array of rules — ethical, evidentiary, substantive, and pro...
Ghostwriting a complaint: ethical issues
May a lawyer ethically “ghost write” a sufficient complaint for the plaintiff to file pro se? This might be attractive to a lawyer when the case appears worthwhile on its face, the statute of limitation is about to run, and the lawyer doesn’t have time to fully evaluate the case. Once the comp...
The Lawyer-Witness Rule Explained
In Fine Housing, Inc. v. Sloan, 2020 S.C. App. LEXIS 89 (S.C. Ct. App. 2020), the court of appeals discussed a number of aspects of the lawyer-witness rule, South Carolina Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7, which is identical to the ABA Model Rule. First, the court recognized that disqualification un...
Unauthorized practice of law and Covid19 – change is in the air
Consider the situation of a lawyer who works at home from a jurisdiction different from the jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted to practice. This might occur because the lawyer is now working at home because of Covid19, or the lawyer is a part-time employee working virtually for a law firm...
COVID-19 – Temporary Practice in DC
In OPINION 24-20 (“Teleworking from Home and the COVID-19 Pandemic”),the D.C. Court of Appeals Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law (DC UPL Committee) decided that out-of-state lawyers can practice while physically present there due to COVID19. The DC UPL Committee opined that &#...
Some ethical, malpractice and professional implications of Covid19 crisis for lawyers. Part IV: financial instability during or after the pandemic
This is the fourth of a series of blogs dealing with possible ethics and malpractice implications of Covid19 (see here, here, and here for the previous blogs). This pandemic is potentially triggering an increased exposure to ethics complaints and malpractice. Here we deal with financial instabilit...
Some ethical (and malpractice) implications of Covid19 crisis for lawyers. Part III: Family obligations during the pandemic
It is common knowledge that the practice of law is not the profession that you choose if you want to have a good work/life balance. In a program organized by the ABA, What Women Want: Strategies for Law Practice Leaders (now on demand on the ABA website), the speakers reported a statistic: At law ...
Some ethical (and malpractice) implications of the Covid19 crisis for lawyers. Part II: physical and/or mental illness during the pandemic
This is the second blog a series dedicated to the ethical and malpractice implications of the covid19 crisis for lawyers. In the first blog we dealt with some of the ethical and malpractice issues deriving from working from home under the duties of confidentiality, competence, and supervision. We de...
Some ethical (and malpractice) implications of Covid19 crisis for lawyers. Part I: Working from home: confidentiality, competence, and supervision
The implications of the covid19 crisis are already imposing. It is expected that the situation will get worst before getting better. Law firms are no exception. Working under the lockdown is certainly causing disruption to the usual way in which lawyers practice law; it also has ethical implications...
Evolving scrutiny of prosecutorial misconduct
As it well known, prosecutors are subject to the same ethics rules as lawyers. There some notable differences, however. Prosecutors, unlike lawyers, have an obligation to do justice (see Comment [1] to Model Rule 3.8[i] and case law[ii]), although the exact boundaries of this obligation are unclear....
Accepting lawyers’ fees in cryptocurrency – Formal Opinion 2019-5
In Formal Opinion 2019-5, the New York City Bar Ethics Committee was asked the following question: Is a fee agreement requiring the client to pay for legal services in cryptocurrency a business transaction governed by Rule 1.8(a)? (emphasis added) The Committee advised that agreements requiring the ...
A “key employee insurance policy” can be voided by failure to disclose material information
On October 9, 2019, Series 1 of Oxford Insurance Company NC, LLC (“Oxford’) filed a complaint in the US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina against Buckley, LLP seeking a judgement on whether or not Oxford has any obligation to indemnify Buckley under an insurance p...
The rise of the shadow lobbyists
Under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, members of Congress are required to wait a certain period after they leave office before they are allowed to lobby. Former members of the House of Representatives are required to wait one year while former members of the Senate are required to wait two years. Howev...
Internal on-line wage-hour compliance training can be privileged
On February 5, 2019, the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island found that an on-line wage-hour compliance training document is covered by the attorney-client privilege. By way of background. The plaintiff attended an annual on-line training on U.S. wage-hour compliance conduc...
WP doctrine: a recent case
In Johnson v. Air Liquide Large Industries U.S. L.P., Case No. 2:18-CV-259-WCB, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152963, (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2019), a district court in Texas analyzed both attorney client privilege (ACP) and work product (WP) protection for documents created in an investigation. The court compa...
The Vast Unmet Need for Legal Services
We live in the age of “disruption.” … Can we understand what is happening in the legal services industry, and can we envision where these developments are likely to lead so that we can begin to prepare for the future? Perhaps surprisingly, some interesting answers come from Utah...
Lawyers may direct clients to fee financing
On November 27, 2018, the American Bar Association issued ABA formal opinion 484 addressing attorneys’ ethical obligations when clients use companies or brokers to finance their fees. ABA Formal Opinion 484 considers fee financing arrangements of the types described below as ethically permissible ...
Is that ethical for a lawyer to accept earnest money through PayPal?
Is that ethical for a lawyer to accept earnest money through PayPal? The SC Ethics Advisory Committee opined that it is with certain caveats. In Opinion 18-05 (“Lawyer accepting earnest money deposits from a client through PayPal” the Committee opined that A lawyer is required to hold pr...
Does a lawyer need to preserve or turn over information if after an initial consultation the lawyer is not retained?
In Ethics Opinion 3474(Ethical Obligations Regarding Prospective Client Information),the D.C. Bar Legal Ethics Committee opined on an interesting issue: whether there is an ethical duty to preserve......
Lawyers may direct clients to fee financing
American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility Lawyers may direct clients to fee financing On November 27, 2018, the American Bar Association issued ABA formal opinion 484 addressing attorneys’ ethical obligations when clients use companies or b...
Unethical Provisions in Sexual Harassment Settlement Agreements
The media are filled with news about sexual harassment claims, the most recent being actor Bill Cosby’s conviction for sexual assault. Washington Post, April 27, 2018. In many of these cases lawyers for the alleged harassers are involved in negotiating settlements of these claims with the victims ...
The duty to inform clients when lawyers make mistakes
The ABA Committee on Ethics recently provided concrete advice to lawyers on when they must inform they clients when they make mistakes. The source of the duty is ABA Model Rule 1.4, dealing with client communication. Crucial to the application of the rule is whether the mistake is “material....
Use of a file-sharing site without password was found to constitute a waiver of attorney-client privilege and work product protection
On February 9, 2017, a Virginia District Court deemed that the posting of privileged information on the web without protection results in a waiver. In this case, Harleysville Insurance Company, (“Harleysville”) sued the defendants, Holding Funeral Home, Inc. seeking a declaratory judgmen...
The NY Court Appeals revisits the champerty doctrine
Last year the New York Court of Appeals held that a purchase by an off-shore shell company of notes that were in default when the payment of the purchase price was contingent on recovery by the shell company violated the New York champerty statute, N.Y. Jud. L. 489, which prohibits the acquisition o...
Unauthorized practice of law – A recent decision of the SC Supreme Court
The SC Supreme Court, on February 22, 2017, found that a group managing HOAs (Community Management Group, “CMG”) committed unauthorized practice of law by representing associations in magistrates court, filing judgments in circuit court, preparing and recording liens, and (4) advertising it coul...
Self-Assessment Checklists May Help Lawyers in Risk Management
The practice of law is laden with risk. Ok … yes … we all know that. The difficult problem that lawyers face is what they can do to reduce risk without devoting so much time to risk management that it interferes with the practice of law. Technology is the answer. Right? Well not ...
When does blogging constitute advertising?
In Formal Opinion 2016-196, the California State Bar Ethics Committee dealt with the question of when a blog by a lawyer is subject to the ethics rules on advertising. If a blog is integrated into a lawyer’s website, it will be treated as advertising. A separate blog or blog post may or may no...
Is a certificate of merit always necessary when you sue a law firm?
As it well know, in the vast majority jurisdictions, when you sue a professional (lawyers, doctors and others) in negligence, a certificate a merit issued by a professional of the same profession is necessary as a condition to bring the action. SC Code 15-36-100 (B) provides that “in an action for...
How ethical is participating in fixed-fee referral services like Avvo in light of SC, Ohio, and Pennsylvania ethics opinions
In Ethics Advisory Opinion 16-06, the SC Ethics Advisory Committee opined that lawyers cannot ethically participate into fixed-fee legal referral services like Avvo. The Committee had been asked to opine on whether an arrangement in which an attorney participates in an internet advertising directory...
Avvo model rejected in three jurisdictions
PA joins SC and OH in finding that lawyer participation in Avvo fixed fee referral program is unethical. Links to ethics opinions. South Carolina: http://www.scbar.org/Bar-Members/Ethics-Advisory-Opinions/Opinion-View/ArticleId/2455/Ethics-Advisory-Opinion-16-06 Ohio: http://www.supremecourt.ohio....
The non adversity of the Anders Brief …
If counsel on appeal on criminal cases consider the appeal frivolous, they must file a brief indicating anything in the record that might arguably support an appeal (Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)), or they cannot withdraw. It is called the “Anders Brief” While the Anders brief is not ...
The privilege waiver effect of voluntary disclosures to the Government after CISA
The Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (CISA) in broad terms allows companies to monitor and cyberthreats. In particular, under CISA companies can share with DHS Cybersecurity threat indicator (CTI) and Defensive measures (DM). More on CISA here. CISA is a voluntary program for companies ...
A rose by any other name is . . . a partner? Non-equity partners formally approved by North Carolina Bar
It used to be the case that lawyers practiced either as solo practitioners or in partnership. Over the years the organizational forms for lawyers have changed dramatically for tax, liability, and economic reasons. Lawyers now have the option to choose the type of organization that minimizes tax ...
Attorney-client privilege for mixed business, lobbying, and legal communication
Connecticut Supreme Court has recently ruled that the attorney-client privilege applies when a communication between an attorney and a client is primary for legal advice. Harrington v. Freedom of Info. Comm’n, 323 Conn. 1 (2016) [2016 BL 281220] The context is important: plaintiff tries to get...
NJ Supreme Court Comm on Attorney Advertising issues notice on how lawyers may advertise “Best Lawyers” award and similar
On May 4, 2016, the New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on Attorney Advertising issued a notice to the Bar on “attorney advertising of awards, honors, and accolades that compare a lawyer’s services to other lawyers’ service. After the Committee received numerous grievances regarding attorney ad...
CCBE’s recommendations to protect confidentiality from government’s surveillance
On April 28, 2016, the CCBE issued a paper about the standards necessary “to ensure that the essential principles of professional secrecy and legal professional privilege are not undermined by practices undertaken by the state involving the interception of communications and access to lawyers...
Association of attorneys can be found vicariously liable for the malpractice of members even if not a firm
In Wildasin v. Mathes, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31672 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 11, 2016), a federal court was called to decide whether an association of lawyers could be held vicariously liable for the malpractice of a member. The court found that it could. In this case, a member (Mathes) of an “association ...
New edition of Annotated South Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct presented on May 17, 2016 in Columbia
On May 17, 2016, Professor Nathan Crystal, at the SC Bar Conference Center in Columbia, will deliver a continuing legal education program for the South Carolina Bar on the occasion of the publication of his 2016 edition of the Annotated South Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct (coauthored with...
Physical presence in the practice of law still matters in an age of technology
Even in an era in which technology is enveloping the practice of law physical presence still matters, as shown by two recent decisions from California and New York. In Arroyo v. TP-Link USA Corp., No. CV 16-1044 PA (KKx), 2016 BL 128659 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2016), the court held that a virtual office...
Second Circuit holds it is not unconstitutional to require non-resident attorneys to maintain a physical office in NY to practice law in NY
On April 22, 2016 the Second Circuit ruled that it is not unconstitutional to require non-resident attorneys to maintain a physical office in New York in order to practice law in that state’s courts. Schoenefeld v. State of New York, Docket No. 11‐4283‐cv. Plaintiff Ekaterina Schoenefeld, a c...
Heads up: Copyright attorneys should look closely at fee-shifting case pending before Supreme Court
In Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley and Sons the Court is called to resolve a split among Circuits on the appropriate standard for awarding fee-shifting in the Copyright Act. Here the question presented: What is the appropriate standard for awarding attorneys’ fees to a prevailing party under § 505 of...
Nathan Crystal at ABA SIL program “Affiliation Agreements Between Law Firms: Across the Borders”
April 15, 2016 at 9.00 Grand Hyatt in NYC Discussion of current developments regarding affiliation among law firms from different countries (including international networks of law firms), the ethics rules and different regulations that present a challenge to the affiliation and the situations wh...
Nathan Crystal speaking at the ABA SIL program “Affiliation Agreements Between Law Firms: Across the Borders”
This Friday April 15, 2016 at 9.00 in NYC I will be speaking at the program “Affiliation Agreements Between Law Firms: Across the Borders”. As the title suggests, the program will discuss current developments regarding affiliation among law firms from different countries (including inter...
When a prospective client becomes a risk to a lawyer (read: disqualification risk)
Quick reaction – Is having a prospective client a good thing? Answer: It depends. A prospective client may become an actual revenue producing client (which is good) but could also create serious risks for the law firm. Here I will focus on one of those risks: disqualifying conflicts of interes...
Choice of Law in Legal Malpractice
We will deal here with choice of law issues in malpractice actions and not with choice of law issues in disciplinary matters. This latter is governed by Model Rule 8.5 (and its state equivalent), which provides that in case of litigation matters, the ethics rules of the jurisdiction in which ...
Dealing with foreign counsel and foreign privilege: Don’t forget that foreign in-house counsel generally do not enjoy the privilege
Documents and other data containing client information are transferred daily across international borders. In-house counsel and outside counsel based in the United States who deal regularly with foreign in house counsel need to be aware of two important aspects of such international communications. ...
In-house counsel’s possible trap: Be aware of the “business advice” risk to the privilege
A fundamental difference between in-house counsel and outside counsel is that a central part of the role of in-house counsel is rendering not only legal but business (or other nonlegal) advice; by contrast, advice giving beyond the legal remains a secondary aspect of the role of outside counsel. Inv...
“Predictive coding” and other TAR as well-accepted methods of document review in federal courts
Four years after Da Silva Moorev. Publicis Groupe., 287 F.R.D. 182 (S.D.N.Y. 2012), laid the foundation for use of predictive coding or technology assisted review (TAR) in electronic discovery, Judge Peck has issued a new opinion dealing with predictive coding. In this fraud case, he stressed that i...
Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, effective December 1, 2015 – scope of discovery and sanctions
I will discuss the most important changes concerning scope of discovery and relevant sanctions. Rule 26 previously defined the scope of discovery broadly to include any information “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” That language has been replaced by “prop...
Attorney suspended for breach of confidentiality in responding to clients’ online criticism
A Colorado attorney was suspended from the practice of law for 18 months on several grounds, including answering to clients’ criticism online by disclosing confidential information. People v. Underhill , 2015 Colo. Discipl. LEXIS 72. More on People v Underhill (including a link to full decis...
Lateral movements – providing notice to clients
If a lawyer is changing firms, how should the lawyer and the old firm handle notification to existing clients of the lawyer’s departure? The issue of notification to clients represented by the departing lawyer arises both when departing lawyers move to new firms or open their own practices. D...
Common interest doctrine enlarged by the Second Circuit to include lenders
On November 10, 2015, the Second Circuit, reversed the lower court’s denial of a petition to quash a IRS summon. The lower court had found that the sharing of a tax memo prepared by Shaeffler’s lawyers with a consortium of banks in connection with an offering of an $11 million refinancing destro...
Temporary multi-jurisdictional practice in transactional matters
The terms “limited admission” or “temporary practice” are often used interchangeably used to refer to situations in which an out-of-state lawyer (“OSL”) – or even a lawyer from another country – practices in a state different from that of his or her admission. However, to be sure...
Temporary practice (of US and foreign attorneys) now possible in New York under certain conditions
On December 10, 2015 the Court of Appeals approved Part 522 (Foreign In-House Lawyers) and Part 523 (Temporary Practice). The Court enacted 22 NYCRR §523 (Section 523), permitting temporary practice in New York (both by US lawyers and foreign lawyers). The approval – which has been advocated, a...
Lateral movement: When should departing lawyers inform their firms of their plans to leave?
Lawyers have fiduciary obligations to their firms. A fiduciary has a duty to disclose material information to the principal. However, lawyers may engage in preliminary negotiations with prospective new firms and may make plans to open their own practice without disclosing such activities to their cu...
Lateral movements and conflicts of interest
If a lawyer is changing firms, when does a conflict of interest exist and what can be done about it? When lawyers decide to leave a firm and open their own office, conflict of interest issues should not arise because the new firm will not have existing clients. On the other hand, three types ...
Lateral movements: When should departing lawyers inform their firms of their plans to leave?
Lawyers have fiduciary obligations to their firms. A fiduciary has a duty to disclose material information to the principal. However, lawyers may engage in preliminary negotiations with prospective new firms and may make plans to open their own practice without disclosing such activities to their cu...
Confidentiality issues in lateral movement and firm’s breakup
This is the first of a series of blogs dealing with issues arising from lawyers’ lateral movement and firm’s breakup #1 If a lawyer is joining a new firm (either in a straight departure or as a result of a law firm breakup), may the lawyer reveal information to the new firm to do a [&hel...
Can I Assign my Legal Malpractice Claim?
The short answer as it is often in law is: it depends. There are two recent cases that can help you draw your conclusions. In Skipper v. Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Co., the South Carolina Supreme answered the following question: “Can a legal malpractice claim be assigned between adversari...
Avoiding loss of your malpractice coverage
Nathan M. Crystal Most legal malpractice insurance applications and renewals include a general question similar to the following one asking the applicant to disclose “any circumstance which may result in a claim being made against your firm.” This question must be answered with care because ...
ABA Opinion 471 (Ethical Obligations of Lawyer to Surrender Papers and Property to which Former Client is Entitled) released
On July 1, 2015 the Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility released Formal Opinion 471 -“Ethical Obligations of Lawyer to Surrender Papers and Property to which Former Client is Entitled” Digest: “Upon the termination of a representation, a lawyer is required under Mode...
California issues Opinion 2015-193 on lawyers’ ethical duties in handling e-discovery
In Formal Opinion 2015-193 the State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct (“California Ethics Committee” or “Committee”) discussed three of the duties applicable to attorneys involved in e-discovery: the duty of competency, the duty to supervise, an...
WP Protection varies depending on whether court adopts “assist” in litigation or “because of” litigation standard
WP Protection varies depending on whether court adopts “assist” in litigation or “because of” litigation standard Some recent court decisions appear to adopt a narrow view of attorney-work product (WP) protection, limiting the doctrine to material prepared to “assist” in litigation. See ...
Broadrock Gas Services v. AIG – internal legal memo may not be protected by attorney client privilege in NY
The federal court for the Southern District of New York recently held that internal legal memo may not be protected by attorney client privilege in NY . Broadrock Gas Services, LLC v. AIG Specialty Insurance Co., No. 14 cv. 3927 (AJN) (MHD), 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26462 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2015). I ...
Litigation hold triggered for foreign companies when litigation in the U.S. can reasonably be anticipated
On February 12, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio issued a decision in an IP dispute, deciding on issues raised in anticipation of a discovery dispute conference. Among other issues, the Court clarified that the obligation to preserve evidence arises for a fore...
What is an “aggregate settlement”? The Oregon Supreme Court held that interdependence between claims is required.
The Oregon Supreme Court has held that the aggregate settlement rule, ABA Model Rule 1.8(g), applies when interdependence between client claims exists. A settlement offer that aggregates minimum authority obtained from clients individually is not an aggregate settlement. By doing that the Court adop...
inShare Share Copying general counsel does not in itself make a document privileged
Kleen Products LLC v. International Paper, Case No. 10 C 5711, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163987 (N.D. Ill.), holding that an email that copies the in-house counsel (“along with several other high level managers”) — and generally asks for “comments” from the recipients, is not in itself privile...
What effect does a client’s failure to pursue an appeal in an underlying action have on his or her ability to maintain a legal malpractice lawsuit?
In Grace v. Law, 2014 WL 5325363 (N.Y. Oct. 21, 2014) the New York Court of Appeals decided an important issue of first impression: “What effect does a client’s failure to pursue an appeal in an underlying action have on his or her ability to maintain a legal malpractice lawsuit?” The Court he...
Multijurisdictional practice – Some variations under Rule 5.5
ABA Model Rule 5.5 ABA Model Rule 5.5 lists among the exceptions to unauthorized practice that a lawyer does not commit unauthorized practice if he or she represents a client on a temporary basis in a jurisdiction where the lawyer is not admitted to practice if the legal services “arise out of or ...
NY Ethics opinion outlines factors for choice of ethics rules when lawyers are admitted in several jurisdictions. Opinion 1027 (10/16/2014)
An attorney admitted in New York and the District of Columbia with offices in both the jurisdictions, dealing with transactional work asked the Committee which “confidentiality, conflicts of interest” and other rules of ethics should govern his conduct. The relevant Rule of the New York Rules of...
Third party beneficiaries named in a will or estate planning can sue in malpractice the decedent’s attorney
South Carolina S Ct. recognizes claim for legal malpractice by third party beneficiary named in an existing will or estate planning document. Fabian v. Lindsay, Op. No. 27460 (October 29, 2014) Read the decision here...
Special litigation committee’s report may enjoy ACP or WP protection
In derivative action a special litigation committee’s report may be entitled to attorney-client privilege or work product protection. So the Indiana Supreme Court decided in TP Orthodontics, Inc. v. Kesling, 15 N.E.3d 985 (Ind. 2014). This was a derivative action pursuant to Indiana Code § 23-1-3...
Work Product Protection for Expert Witness’ work – court held that allowing opponent to see Expert’s Drafts to Evaluate Counsel’s Involvement in the Expert’s Report, Frustrates Foundation of revisions to F.R.Civ.P. 26
On August 25, 2014, In U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Newell, Case No. 12 C 6763, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117734, at *9 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 25, 2014) plaintiff moved to compel defendants’ expert drafts report based on the argument that they could not benefit from work product protection of...
How wide is the common interest privilege?
A recent NY decision restricts the common interest privilege to a common legal interest. Schaeffler v U.S., No 13 Civ. 4864 (S.D.N.Y. May 28 2014)...
Delaware Supreme Court recognizes “good cause” exception to attorney-client privilege in derivative litigation
In a derivative action a shareholder of a corporation or member of an LLC or other entity beings suit claiming that the entity has failed to assert rights belonging to the entity to the detriment of its shareholders or members. Recovery in a derivative action inures to the benefit of the entity. ...
Judge turns down as inequitable disqualification motion filed on the verge of trial for facts known long time before – Reeves v. The Town of Cottageville, 2:12-cv-02765-DCN (D.S.C.)
Motions to disqualify opposing counsel for conflicts of interest occur often in litigation. Responses to such motion usually focus on the merits of the conflict allegations. However, it is important to know that the granting or denial of disqualification motions rests with the sound discretion o...
Tuten v. Joel (S.C. Ct.App. August 27, 2014) – terminating a practice does not take a lawyer off the hook.
In this malpractice action, client sued both the new lawyer (Glover) and the old lawyer (Joel). Both are held responsible for missing the statute of limitation. The Court of Appeals reminded lawyers that an effective withdrawal requires not only court permission but a clear communication to the clie...
Do you offer to represent current/former employees of your corporate client? You might be soliciting
A lawyer for an entity in litigation, engages in solicitation when the lawyer contacts current or former employees to offer to represent them with payment by the entity. Rivera v. Lutheran Medical Center, 866 N.Y.S. 2d 520 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Kings Cty. 2008), aff’d, 899 N.Y.S. 2d 859 (2d Dep’t 201...
A sensible approach to the “fiduciary duty” and “current client” exceptions to the attorney-client privilege
Imagine that an attorney receives notice from client that a malpractice suit is being considered and that attorney consults with in-house ethics counsel at his or her firm to understand how best to proceed before obtaining consent from the client or terminate representation; client later brings a ...
Aggregate settlements (Nonclass)
Aggregate settlements (Nonclass) are agreements involving multiple clients in which the terms of the settlement are interdependent. They involve complex ethical and practical issues. In addition, such cases often involve a large number of claimants and substantial amounts of money. Ethics advice is...
Why ADR
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) refers to various procedures other than litigation for resolving disputes. ADR comes in a wide variety of forms and procedures. The most common forms of ADR are arbitration and mediation, but there are many others such as med-arb, summary jury trials, mini-trials...